Author:
de Graaff Jan,Zietz Joachim
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of crime on apartment prices for Hamburg, Germany, for the years 2012 to 2017.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors use a panel data setting with fixed effects estimators and temporal lags to moderate the endogeneity concerns related to crime. The authors consider the effect of total crime, violent and property crime and some sub-categories of crime.
Findings
The estimates show that it takes two to three years for prices to react, with the longer run elasticity reaching −0.12 for total crime, −0.15 for property crime and −0.06 for violent crime. The elasticities are much larger in high-crime areas (−0.22 for total crime, −0.28 and −0.09 for property and violent crime) and elevated also in low-income areas.
Social implications
The finding that property crime matters more in terms of quantitative impact for housing values than violent crime provides reasonable grounds for rethinking the resource allocation of public spending on crime clearance and prevention in Germany. Far more emphasis on preventing property crime appears in order and especially so in the lower income or higher crime areas, which are significantly more affected by crime and in particular property crime than those in high income or low crime areas.
Originality/value
The estimates for Hamburg provide the first detailed results of the impact of crime on real estate prices in Germany. It is also the first study for Continental Europe using panel data.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. Blowing it up and knocking it down: the local and city-wide effects of demolishing high concentration public housing on crime;Journal of Urban Economics,2015
2. Do neighbourhood renewal programs reduce crime rates? Evidence from England;Journal of Urban Economics,2019
3. The wrong side(s) of the tracks: estimating the causal effects of racial segregation on city outcomes;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2011
4. Autor, D.H., Palmer, C.J. and and Pathak, P.A. (2017), “Gentrification and the amenity value of crime reductions: evidence from rent deregulation”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 23914, Cambridge, Mass.
5. Spatial panel-data models using stata;The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata,2017
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献