Author:
Roberts Simon J.,Stott Tim
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to study relative age effects (RAEs) in a selected sample of university students. The majority of education systems across the globe adopt age-related cut-off points for eligibility. This strategy has received criticism for (dis)advantaging those older children born closer to the “cut-off” date for entry into an academic year and for promoting the existence of RAEs. To date, there are only two studies which have examined the relative age phenomenon in a university setting specifically.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data of student records from the years 2006-2009 were analysed. Specifically this included date of birth, The Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) entry points, gender, grade point averages and final year degree classification.
Findings
– Analysis of data collected from 460 university students revealed a significant RAE reversal. Specifically, relatively younger students achieved significantly higher first-class honours degrees than relatively older students (p
<
0.01).
Research limitations/implications
– Limitations include the following: the sample was modest and restricted to only 460 students located within one of the universities five faculties. Recent RAE studies in education have recruited thousands of students; therefore, these findings may not be totally representative of the broader UK university population.
Originality/value
– This is only the second UK-based study to examine RAEs from a university perspective. The findings highlight an interesting and new insight into the RAE phenomenon and one that warrants further scientific attention.
Reference33 articles.
1. Armstrong, H.G.
(1966), “A comparison of the performance of summer and autumn-born children at eleven and sixteen”,
British Journal of Educational Psychology
, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 72-76.
2. Ashworth, J.
and
Heyndels, B.
(2007), “Selection bias and peer effects in team sports: the effect of age grouping on earnings of German soccer players”,
Journal of Sports Economics
, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 355-277.
3. Bedard, K.
and
Dhuey, E.
(2006), “The persistence of early childhood maturity: international evidence of long-rung effects”,
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
, Vol. 121 No. 4, pp. 1437-1472.
4. Bell, J.F.
and
Daniels, S.
(1990), “Are summer-born children disadvantaged? The birthdate effect in education”,
Oxford Review of Education
, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 67-80.
5. Bergund, G.W.
(1967), “A note on intelligence and date of birth”,
The British Journal of Psychology
, Vol. 58 Nos 1/2, pp. 147-151.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献