Author:
Gross Revital,Tabenkin Hava,Brammli‐Greenberg Shuli
Abstract
Assesses the degree of self‐reported implementation of gatekeeping in clinical practice, and gains insight into primary care physicians’ attitudes toward gatekeeping and their perceptions of necessary conditions for implementation of gatekeeping in daily practice. A self‐administered questionnaire was mailed to a national sample of 800 primary care physicians in Israel, with a response rate of 86 per cent. Multivariate analysis indicated that sick fund affiliation was the main predictor of self‐reported implementation of gatekeeping, while specialty training predicted primary care physicians’ attitude toward this role. Close communication with specialists, continuous medical education, and management support of physician decisions were identified by respondents as being important conditions for gatekeeping. Discusses strategies to gain the cooperation of primary care physicians, which is necessary for implementing an effective gatekeeping system.
Reference30 articles.
1. Bendlack, J. (1998), Sick Fund Membership, Survey series number 150, The National Insurance Institute, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
2. Birnbaum, M. and Walleck, C.A. (1993), “Rationing health care, impact on critical care”, Critical Care Clinician, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 585‐602.
3. Bradlow, J. and Coulter, A. (1993), “Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners prescribing costs”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 307, pp. 1186‐9.
4. Dowell, J.S., Snadden, D. and Dunbar, A.J. (1995), “Changing to generic formulary: how one fundholding practice reduced prescribing costs”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 310, pp. 505‐8.
5. Eisenberg, J.M. (1985), “Physician utilization: the state of research about physicians’ practice patterns”, Medical Care, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 461‐83.