Selection of tailored practices for supply chain management

Author:

Barros Ana Cristina,Barbosa‐Póvoa Ana Paula,Blanco Edgar E.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate what hinders businesses to achieve superior supply chain performance and how this knowledge may be used in the process of selection of tailored practices for supply chain management (SCM).Design/methodology/approachLiterature review and secondary case studies were used to identify hinders of superior supply chain performance. A method for the selection of tailored practices for SCM is developed. Case study research is used to validate the value of the developed method for practice and research.FindingsThis research identifies detrimental phenomena that are observed in the management of supply chains: waste, uncertainty, vulnerability, congestion, bullwhip, diseconomies of scale and self‐interest. It develops and illustrates a method for the selection of tailored SCM practices.Research limitations/implicationsThis research did not verify the completeness of the list of phenomena identified. The implementation of the selected practices was not in the scope of the case studies.Practical implicationsResearchers may use the phenomena to study the impact of different practices in the overall supply chain performance, as well as to study the interactions between the different phenomena. Practitioners may use the proposed method as a diagnosis and continuous improvement tool for their supply chain.Originality/valueAlthough the supply chain phenomena have been explored individually in the literature, a holistic approach of the phenomena had not yet been developed to the best of our knowledge. The method developed identifies a set of tailored practices that are in alignment with the context and strategy of the business and decrease the overall effects of the detrimental phenomena.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference87 articles.

1. Barthélemy, J. (2006), “The experimental roots of revolutionary vision”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 81‐84.

2. Beckman, C.M., Haunschild, P.R. and Phillips, D.J. (2004), “Friends or strangers? Firm‐specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection”, Organization Science, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 259‐275.

3. Bhagwat, R. and Sharma, M.K. (2007), “Performance measurement of supply chain management: a balanced scorecard approach”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 43‐62.

4. Bolstorff, P. and Rosenbaum, R. (2003), Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR Model, Amacom, New York, NY.

5. Brewer, P.C. and Speh, T.W. (2000), “Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 75‐93.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3