Author:
Fayezi Sajad,Zutshi Ambika,O'Loughlin Andrew
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to address an important question which centres on investigating how do manufacturing businesses perceive and understand the concepts of agility and flexibility in their supply chains (SCs).
Design/methodology/approach
– A case study approach was utilised and data were gathered from semi-structured interviews with ten organisations in the Australian manufacturing sector. Data analysis was conducted using analytic techniques based on, for example, pattern matching and cross-case synthesis.
Findings
– Findings confirmed that there is some ambiguity concerning the understanding of the terms agile and flexible, both within and between organisations. The implications are that there is often little consistency in the way the terms are operationalised and then applied. In this regard, and to inform future research, the paper offers empirically grounded definitions for SC agility and flexibility. Moreover, four propositions are developed and discussed which shed light on the dynamics of agility and flexibility in the SC.
Originality/value
– This is one of the first empirical studies to address some of the apparent inconsistencies between organisational applications of agility and flexibility, and their impact on SC operations.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference127 articles.
1. Aravind Raj, S.
,
Sudheer, A.
,
Vinodh, S.
and
Anand, G.
(2013), “A mathematical model to evaluate the role of agility enablers and criteria in a manufacturing environment”,
International Journal of Production Research
, Vol. 51 No. 19, pp. 5971-5984.
2. Avittathur, B.
and
Swamidass, P.
(2007), “Matching plant flexibility and supplier flexibility: lessons from small suppliers of US manufacturing plants in India”,
Journal of Operations Management
, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 717-735.
3. Baker, J.
(1996), “Agility and flexibility: what’s the difference?”, Working Paper No. SWP 5/96, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield.
4. Barad, M.
and
Even Sapir, D.
(2003), “Flexibility in logistic systems-modeling and performance evaluation”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 85 No. 2, pp. 155-170.
5. Baramichai, M.
,
Zimmers, E.W. Jr
and
Marangos, C.A.
(2007), “Agile supply chain transformation matrix: an integrated tool for creating an agile enterprise”,
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 334-348.
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献