The promised land? Why social inequalities are systemic in the creative industries

Author:

Ruth Eikhof Doris,Warhurst Chris

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a more comprehensive understanding of why social inequalities and discrimination remain in the creative industries.Design/methodology/approachThe paper synthesizes existing academic and industry research and data, with a particular focus on the creative media industries.FindingsThe paper reveals that existing understanding of the lack of diversity in the creative industries’ workforce is conceptually limited. Better understanding is enabled through an approach centred on the creative industries’ model of production. This approach explains why disadvantage and discrimination are systemic, not transitory.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that current policy assumptions about the creative industries are misguided and need to be reconsidered. The findings also indicate how future research of the creative industries ought to be framed.Originality/valueThe paper provides a novel synthesis of existing research and data to explain how the creative industries’ model of production translates into particular features of work and employment, which then translate into social inequalities that entrench discrimination based on sex, race and class.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference60 articles.

1. Ashley, L. (2010), “Making a difference? The use (and abuse) of diversity management at the UK's elite law firms”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 211‐227.

2. Banks, M. (2007), The Politics of Cultural Work, Palgrave, London.

3. Banks, M. and Milestone, K. (2011), “Individualization, gender and cultural work”, Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 73‐89.

4. BECTU (2009a), “Expenses‐only engagements are illegal, say employment tribunals”, available at: www.bectu.org.uk/news/549?print=true (accessed 15 December 2009).

5. BECTU (2009b), “Industry must improve working conditions for new entrants”, available at: www.bectu.org.uk/news/328?print=true (accessed 15 December 2009).

Cited by 131 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3