Abstract
PurposeThis duoethnography explores feelings of belonging that emerged as being relevant to the participants of a doctoral organisational change study. It challenges the prolific change management models that inadvertently encourage anti-belonging.Design/methodology/approachA change management practitioner and her doctoral supervisor share their dialogic reflections and reflexivity on the case study to open new conversations and raise questions about how communicating belonging enhances practice. They draw on Ubuntu philosophy (Tutu, 1999) to enrich Pinar's currere (1975) for understandings of belonging, interconnectedness, humanity and transformation.FindingsThe authors show how dialogic practice in giving employees a voice, communicating honestly, using inclusive language and affirmation contribute to a stronger sense of belonging. Suppressing the need for belonging can deepen a communication shadow and create employee resistance and alienation. Sharing in each other's personal transformation, the authors assist others in better understanding the feelings of belonging in organisational change.Practical implicationsPractitioners will need to challenge change initiatives that ignore belonging. This requires thinking of people as relationships, rather than as numbers or costs, communicating dialogically, taking care with language in communicating changes and facilitating employees to be active participants where they feel supported.Originality/valueFor both practice and academy, this duoethnography highlights a need for greater humanity in change management practices. This requires increasing the awareness and understanding of an interconnectedness that lies at the essence of belonging or Ubuntu (Tutu, 1999).
Reference39 articles.
1. Beyond letting go and moving on: new perspectives on organizational death, loss and grief;Scandinavian Journal of Management,2011
2. Bochner, A.P. and Riggs, N. (2015), “Practicing narrative inquiry”, in Leavy, P. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 195-222.
3. Bowman, P. (2003), “Cultural studies, Ranciere, politics and queer studies”, in Bowman, P. (Ed.), Interrogating Cultural Studies, Politics, Theory and Intervention, Pluto Press, London, pp. 101-124, available at: http://ranciere.blogspot.com/2008/02/adrian-rifkin-on-cultural-studies.html (accessed 23 July 2019).
4. Brown, H. and Sawyer, R.D. (2016), “Dialogic reflection and exploration of its embodied, imaginative”, in Brown Sawyer, H.R.D. and Norris, J. (Eds), Forms of Practitioner Reflexivity: Critical, Conversational and Arts-Based Approaches, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, pp. 1-12.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献