Communicate belonging? Duoethnography of an organisational change study

Author:

Crestani IvanaORCID,Taylor Jill FentonORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis duoethnography explores feelings of belonging that emerged as being relevant to the participants of a doctoral organisational change study. It challenges the prolific change management models that inadvertently encourage anti-belonging.Design/methodology/approachA change management practitioner and her doctoral supervisor share their dialogic reflections and reflexivity on the case study to open new conversations and raise questions about how communicating belonging enhances practice. They draw on Ubuntu philosophy (Tutu, 1999) to enrich Pinar's currere (1975) for understandings of belonging, interconnectedness, humanity and transformation.FindingsThe authors show how dialogic practice in giving employees a voice, communicating honestly, using inclusive language and affirmation contribute to a stronger sense of belonging. Suppressing the need for belonging can deepen a communication shadow and create employee resistance and alienation. Sharing in each other's personal transformation, the authors assist others in better understanding the feelings of belonging in organisational change.Practical implicationsPractitioners will need to challenge change initiatives that ignore belonging. This requires thinking of people as relationships, rather than as numbers or costs, communicating dialogically, taking care with language in communicating changes and facilitating employees to be active participants where they feel supported.Originality/valueFor both practice and academy, this duoethnography highlights a need for greater humanity in change management practices. This requires increasing the awareness and understanding of an interconnectedness that lies at the essence of belonging or Ubuntu (Tutu, 1999).

Publisher

Emerald

Reference39 articles.

1. Beyond letting go and moving on: new perspectives on organizational death, loss and grief;Scandinavian Journal of Management,2011

2. Bochner, A.P. and Riggs, N. (2015), “Practicing narrative inquiry”, in Leavy, P. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 195-222.

3. Bowman, P. (2003), “Cultural studies, Ranciere, politics and queer studies”, in Bowman, P. (Ed.), Interrogating Cultural Studies, Politics, Theory and Intervention, Pluto Press, London, pp. 101-124, available at: http://ranciere.blogspot.com/2008/02/adrian-rifkin-on-cultural-studies.html (accessed 23 July 2019).

4. Brown, H. and Sawyer, R.D. (2016), “Dialogic reflection and exploration of its embodied, imaginative”, in Brown Sawyer, H.R.D. and Norris, J. (Eds), Forms of Practitioner Reflexivity: Critical, Conversational and Arts-Based Approaches, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, pp. 1-12.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3