Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore peace protest as a form of institutional work aimed at supporting one institution and disrupting another.Design/methodology/approachThe authors utilized walking ethnography (28 miles in 18 h while conducting 25 walking interviews) and digital media analysis (news reports, social media and electronic communication).FindingsWalking participants engaged in multiple types of institutional work aimed at maintaining the Good Friday Agreement and disrupting partisan violence. The institutional work left no lasting impact on either institution.Originality/valueThe paper conceptualizes two competing institutions and situates the dual institutional work of Lyra's Walk in the post-conflict context of Northern Ireland. The study contributes to understanding formality and multiplicity in institutional work research.
Reference64 articles.
1. Uninhibited institutionalisms;Journal of Management Inquiry,2019
2. The determinants of low-intensity intergroup violence: the case of Northern Ireland;Journal of Peace Research,2016
3. Parades, flags, carnivals and riots: public space, contestation and transformation in Northern Ireland;Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology,2015
4. Being on both sides: covert ethnography and partisanship with bouncers in the night‐time economy;Journal of Organizational Ethnography,2021