Measurement of sustainability performance in the public sector
-
Published:2014-02-11
Issue:1
Volume:5
Page:46-67
-
ISSN:2040-8021
-
Container-title:Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
A. Adams Carol,Muir Stephen,Hoque Zahirul
Abstract
Purpose
– This article identifies current performance measurement practice within state, territory and federal government departments in Australia with a particular emphasis on the importance of sustainability performance measures. Whilst voluntary sustainability reporting by private sector organisations aligned, for the most part, with Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines is growing, there is little sustainability reporting by organisations in the public sector. This raises questions as to the extent to which public sector sustainability performance is managed. This research aims to assess the use of sustainability performance measures for supporting organisational performance improvement.
Design/methodology/approach
– A mail out survey approach has been adopted within government departments.
Findings
– The performance measures utilised by organisations to a great extent were in the areas of cost efficiency and quality measures and those utilised to least extent were for learning and growth measures and to satisfy legislative requirements and manage programs. Sustainability, environmental or social responsibility measures are the least used performance measures, and those utilised are mainly measures of employee diversity and non-financial economic aspects that are identified.
Practical implications
– The public sector is unlikely to adopt comprehensive sustainability performance measures while they remain voluntary and while there is no perceived need to be competitive in these areas. Either mandatory reporting is required or some form of competitive process based on performance measures implemented.
Originality/value
– The findings make a contribution to the academic literature on sustainability performance measures in public sector organisations and point to policy measures that may lead to improvements in practice.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference93 articles.
1. Adams, C.A.
and
Frost, G.R.
(2007), “Managing social and environmental performance: do companies have adequate information?”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 17 No. 43, pp. 2-11. 2. ANAO
(2007), Application of the Outcome and Outputs Framework, Audit Report No. 23, Australian National Audit Office, available at: www.anao.gov.au/∼/media/Uploads/Documents/2006%2007_audit_report_23.pdf. 3. Ball, A.
and
Bebbington, J.
(2008), “Editorial: accounting and reporting for sustainable development in public sector organizations”, Public Money & Management, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 323-326. 4. Ball, A.
and
Grubnic, S.
(2007), “Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector”, in
Unerman, J.
,
Bebbington, J.
and
O'Dwyer, B.
(Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, London, pp. 243-265. 5. Bellringer, A.
,
Ball, A.
and
Craig, R.
(2011), “Reasons for sustainability reporting by New Zealand local governments”, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 126-138.
Cited by
143 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|