Author:
Ashby Alison,Leat Mike,Hudson‐Smith Melanie
Abstract
PurposeThe objective of this paper is to investigate systematically the discipline of supply chain management (SCM) within the context of sustainability. The two concepts are increasingly aligned, and sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) represents an evolving field where they explicitly interact. Given their complex and holistic nature, breaking down the literature to understand its structures, processes, connections and limitations can provide an objective view of the status of research in these highly important fields, identifying key areas for future research/theory development.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review of current SCM literature is carried out, specifically in relation to the social and environmental dimensions of sustainability.FindingsSSCM and the integration of sustainability into supply chains is a significant but evolving field evidenced by a current bias in the literature towards theory development and highly qualitative research methods. The environmental dimension is significantly better represented in the literature through specific processes at all stages of the supply chain. The social dimension is recognised, but receives less emphasis than expected given SCM's focus on interaction, relationships and communication. These two dimensions are treated separately in the literature with limited insight on how to integrate them and current SCM and sustainability research provides limited practical outputs.Research limitations/implicationsThe review focuses on environmental and social sustainability within supply chains without explicit consideration of the economic dimension.Practical implicationsThe review highlights the key themes and issues for supply chain managers faced with implementing sustainability. It also illustrates a number of areas for future research, along with the need for researchers to develop more practical tools for implementing SSCM.Originality/valueIndicates the extent to which sustainability is integrated within SCM and where the research emphasis currently lies. The environmental dimension is significantly more defined and developed in the literature. SCM literature emphasises the importance of long‐term supplier relationships, but this “people‐focused” approach does not appear to translate into socially responsible supply chains. It suggests that the more process‐driven nature of environmental sustainability makes it easier to put into supply chain practice. There is also limited research or evidence on how the two dimensions can be integrated despite recognition of their inter‐relationship.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference92 articles.
1. Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A. and Ganapathi, J. (2007), “Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, pp. 836‐63.
2. Albino, V., Balice, A. and Dangelico, R.M. (2009), “Environmental strategies and green product development: an overview on sustainability‐driven companies”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 18, pp. 83‐96.
3. Angell, L.C. and Klassen, R.D. (1999), “Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 575‐98.
4. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2009), “Making sustainable development sustainable”, Management Decision, Vol. 47, pp. 975‐88.
5. Armitage, A. and Keeble‐Allen, D. (2008), “Undertaking a structured literature review or structuring a literature review: tales from the field”, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 6, pp. 103‐14.
Cited by
560 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献