Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study

Author:

Zaim Selim,Turkyılmaz Ali,Acar Mehmet F.,Al‐Turki Umar,Demirel Omer F.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the use of two general purpose decision‐making techniques in selecting the most appropriate maintenance strategy for organizations with critical production requirements.Design/methodology/approachThe Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) are used for the selection of the most appropriate maintenance strategy in a local newspaper printing facility in Turkey.FindingsThe two methods were shown to be effective in choosing a strategy for maintaining the printing machines. The two methods resulted in almost the same results. Both methods take into account the specific requirements of the organization through its own available expertise.Practical implicationsThe techniques demonstrated in this paper can be used by all types of organizations for selecting and adopting maintenance strategies that have higher impact on maintenance performance and hence overall business productivity. The two methods are explained in a step‐by‐step approach for easier adaptation by practitioners in all types of organizations.Originality/valueThe value of the paper is in applying AHP and ANP decision‐making methodologies in maintenance strategy selection. These two methods are not very common in the area of maintenance, and hence add to the pool of techniques utilized in selecting maintenance strategies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference29 articles.

1. Almeida, A.T. and Bohoris, G.A. (1995), “Decision theory in maintenance decision making”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 39‐45.

2. Al‐Najjar, B. and Alsyouf, I. (2003), “Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 84, pp. 85‐100.

3. Arunraj, N.S. and Maiti, J. (2010), “Risk‐based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming”, Safety Science, Vol. 48, pp. 238‐47.

4. Azadivar, F. and Shu, V. (1999), “Maintenance policy selection for JIT production systems”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 37 No. 16, pp. 3725‐38.

5. Bertolini, M. and Bevilacqua, M. (2006), “A combined goal programming‐AHP approach to maintenance selection problem”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 91, pp. 839‐48.

Cited by 99 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3