Development and validation of a scale to measure subjective liminality: individual differences in the perception of in-betweenness

Author:

Dhar UdayanORCID,Boyatzis Richard

Abstract

PurposeModern careers are marked by periods of feeling betwixt, or “in-between,” – yet, there is no validated measure of this experience, recognized as subjective liminality. The present research aims to (1) operationalize subjective liminality and (2) develop and validate a scale to measure it.Design/methodology/approachA literature review was used to operationalize subjective liminality, and the scale validation was performed using four separate samples: 150 workers on M-Turk, 151 graduate and professional students at a large Midwestern University, 252 unemployed individuals in the US and Canada, and 416 full-time employed individuals in the US.FindingsSubjective liminality was conceptualized as a second-order latent construct reflected by three dimensions: feelings of anxiety, ambiguity and reduced group identification. A 9-item scale was developed and validated to measure it.Originality/valueThis study clarifies and measures an emergent construct in the career transition and organizational change literature.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference33 articles.

1. Boundary spanning behaviors of expatriates;Journal of World Business,2002

2. Occupational limbo, transitional liminality and permanent liminality: new conceptual distinctions;Human Relations,2017

3. Baumgartner, H. (2006), “Response biases”, in The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances, Steenkamp J-BEM.

4. Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction;Human Relations,2011

5. Role stressors and customer-oriented boundary-spanning behaviors in service organizations;Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2003

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3