Author:
Stefanescu Cristina Alexandrina
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore the connection between sustainability and non-financial reporting (NFR) settled by the Directive 2014/95/EU, aiming to shed light on how institutional isomorphic pressures (mimetic, coercive and normative) are expressed in terms of sustainability issues influenced its enactment at the European Union (EU) level.
Design/methodology/approach
Empirically, the contribution of this study relied on the complexity of the research design that uses the same statistical methods and techniques (e.g. principal component analysis, correlation and regression analysis) within two stages of analysis (main and robustness) to increase the trustworthy of the results reached.
Findings
The results reveal that countries with sound sustainable management pillars (economic, environmental and social) and development goals promoting economic prosperity, environmental protection and societal well-being (prosperity, planet and people) are more likely to bring active support in enhancing NFR by regulating its framework.
Research limitations/implications
The empirical nature of the research left space for some limitations, as long as it relied on country-level data, thus being quite challenging to gauge the commitment to harmonization with the new Directive. Moreover, the model’s explanatory power remains questionable, as the explanatory variables might be measured differently in the model specifications.
Practical implications
The study addresses academia/regulators/practitioners by ascertaining their potential to better understand/promote/apply the new Directive. Thus, each could support the steps toward standardized sustainability reporting by keeping up to date with the latest improvements/addressing cross-country inconsistencies in the transposition/managing future implementation in a more effective and accountable way.
Originality/value
This paper approaches the harmonization process of NFR across Europe in connection with sustainability issues, grounding on institutional isomorphism. Thus, it fills an existing literature gap, as research studies approaching the new Directive from the institutional theory’s perspective are still scarce and focused on particular countries.
Reference80 articles.
1. Conceptualising future change in corporate sustainability reporting;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2009
2. A synthesis of empirical research on international accounting harmonization and compliance with international financial reporting standards;Journal of Accounting Literature,2005
3. Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review;Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2017
4. An analysis of IFRS and SME-IFRS adoption determinants: a worldwide study;Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,2019
5. An exposé of the challenging practice development of sustainability reporting: from the first wave to the EU directive (2014/95/EU),2018
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献