Quantifying the predictability and preventability of conflicts between construction project parties

Author:

Charkhakan Mohammad Hadi,Heravi GholamrezaORCID

Abstract

PurposeAlthough several studies have aimed to present models to predict conflict outcomes, fewer methods have been developed to analyze conflict manageability and provide management strategies based on prediction models. This research pitches into the manageability analysis of conflicts occur during the implementation of a proposed change in construction projects. In this way, a framework has been developed by defining two parameters: the predictability index and the preventability index.Design/methodology/approachWithin this framework, the predictability index determines how many outcomes of the prediction model can be used for conflict management based on the degree of clarity. The preventability index demonstrates how preventive measures for conflict management can be identified. Eventually, three preventive measures can be determined: (1) identifying weaknesses of decision-making patterns and organizational culture, (2) identifying events that may be prevented using soft skills and (3) identifying differences among similar change-implementation scenarios and evaluating causes of the differences. To demonstrate the capabilities of proposed framework, a practical example has been analyzed.FindingsThe results show that the behavior of the project parties can be psychologically analyzed, and psychological conflicts can be distinguished from technical conflicts. Moreover, identifying the weaknesses of parties' decision-making patterns and their organizational culture is the most effective measure to prevent the conflicts.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the construction body of knowledge by quantifying the predictability and preventability of conflicts between the project parties in a construction project based on: (1) the certainty level of the conflict occurrence and (2) the level of alignment between predicted outcomes of the conflict occurrence and the issued change request and/or change order.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference35 articles.

1. Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,2006

2. Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using an integrated artificial intelligence model;Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,2010

3. Bauer, J. (2002), “A longitudinal evaluation of the impact of organizational structure on role ambiguity and work group performance”, available at: http://www.clc.uc.edu/∼bauerj/JCBauerDissertationFinal.htm (accessed 27 February 2010).

4. Belzer, K. (2004), “Project management: still more art than science”, PM Forum Featured Papers.

5. Prediction of outcome of construction dispute claims using multilayer perceptron neural network model;International Journal of Project Management,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Measuring sensitivity to change orders in construction projects using eigenvector centrality and radius of gyration;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management;2023-01-10

2. Assessment of interorganisational conflict in building refurbishment projects using EFA and PLS-SEM;Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal;2023-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3