What in-patients want: a qualitative study of what's important to mental health service users in their recovery (Wayfinder Partnership)

Author:

Bredski Joanna,Forsyth Kirsty,Mountain Debbie,Harrison Michele,Irvine Linda,Maciver Donald

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a qualitative analysis of the facilitators of recovery in in-patient psychiatric rehabilitation from the service users’ perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Interviews with 31 in-patients were coded and analysed thematically at an interpretive level using an inductive approach. Findings – The dominant themes identified were hope, agency, relationships and opportunity. Totally, 20 subthemes were identified. Agency was more important to men than women and agency, hope and relationships were all more important to detained patients. Research limitations/implications – Interview data were collected in writing rather than taped. The results may not be transferrable to patient populations with significantly different demographic or service factors. Practical implications – Services need to target interventions at the areas identified by service users as important in their recovery. The findings suggest both environmental and relational aspects of care that may optimise recovery. Services also need to be able to measure the quality of the care they provide. A brief, culturally valid and psychometrically assessed instrument for measuring the recovery orientation of services is required. Originality/value – As far as the authors are aware no qualitative work to date has examined the recovery experiences of psychiatric rehabilitation in-patient service users in order to understand what services require to do to enable recovery from their perspective. The conceptual framework identified in this paper can be used to develop a service user self-report measure of the recovery orientation of services.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference19 articles.

1. Anthony, W. (1993), “Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s”, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal , Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 11-23.

2. Boyatzis, R.E. (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

3. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology , Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-101.

4. Deegan, P.E. (1998), “Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation”, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal , Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 11-9.

5. Donnelly, M. , Scott, D. , McGilloway, S. , O'Neill, T. , Williams, J. and Slade, M. (2011), “Patient outcomes: what are the best methods for measuring recovery from mental illness and capturing feedback from patients in order to inform service improvement?”, COM No. 4409/10, a report commissioned by the Bamford Implementation Rapid Review Scheme, available at: www.publichealth.hscni.net/sites/default/files/Patient%20Outcomes.pdf (accessed 11 June 2014).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3