Normative telecommuting: the effects of group composition and task interdependence on telecommuter and non-telecommuter performance

Author:

Podolsky MarkORCID,Ducharme Mary Jo,McIntyre Christa

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines whether group-level homogeneity in telecommuting status is associated with performance differences between teleworkers and non-teleworkers at the individual level. The authors further investigate the impact of group-level task interdependence on this relationship.Design/methodology/approachA group of 225 employees in 41 work groups were surveyed, and employee performance data from the organization was used. A multilevel perspective was used to examine the influence of normative telecommuting on individual performance.FindingsIt was found that while performance differences between telecommuters and non-telecommuters in mixed groups favor non-telecommuters, those differences become non-significant as the proportion of telecommuters increases. Results further show that when group task interdependence is low, there are no performance differences between telecommuters and non-telecommuters. When group task interdependence is high, telecommuters perform better as the proportion of telecommuters in the group increases.Research limitations/implicationsFuture studies should examine the group norms that are formed in predominantly telecommuting groups that support successful telecommuting outcomes.Practical implicationsTelecommuters perform better in groups with proportionally more telecommuters, even when task interdependence is high.Originality/valueThis study furthers our understanding around how telecommuting can be managed at the group level to maximize performance potential.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference58 articles.

1. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings;Psychological Science in the Public Interest,2015

2. Appold, S. (2021), “The past as prologue: remote working to the cusp of the pandemic”, SSRN, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3817885 (accessed 30 March 2021).

3. MuMln: multi-model inference,2022

4. Telecommuting best practices prior and during the COVID-19 pandemic;Journal of Economics,2021

5. Bliese, P.D. (2000), “Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis”, in Klein, K.J. and Kozlowski, S.W.J. (Eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 349-381.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3