Author:
Shortland Susan,Perkins Stephen J.
Abstract
Purpose
– Drawing upon compensating differentials, equity theory, and the psychological contract, women’s voices illustrate how organisational policy dissemination, implementation and change can lead to unintended assignee dissatisfaction with reward. Implications arise for organisational justice which can affect women’s future expatriation decisions. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– A qualitative case study methodology was employed. Reward policies for long-term international assignments (IAs) were analysed. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted confidentially with 21 female long-term assignees selected using stratified sampling, and with two managers responsible for international reward policy design/implementation.
Findings
– Policy transparency is required. Women perceive inequity when allowances based on grade are distorted by family status. Women in dual career/co-working couples expect reward to reflect their expatriate status. Reward inequity is reported linked to specific home/host country transfers. Policy change reducing housing and children’s education are major causes of reward dissatisfaction.
Research limitations/implications
– This case study research was cross-sectional and set within one industry. It addressed reward outcomes only for long-term IAs from the perspectives of women who had accepted expatriation in two oil and gas firms.
Practical implications
– Reward policy should be transparent. Practitioners might consider the inter-relationship between policy elements depending on grade and accompanied status, location pairings, and the effects of policy content delivery to dual career/co-working couples.
Originality/value
– This paper advances the field of IA reward by examining compensating differentials, equity and the psychological contract and takes these forward via implications for organisational justice. It identifies reward elements that support women’s expatriation and address their low share of expatriate roles, thereby fostering gender diversity. Future research themes are presented.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business and International Management
Reference102 articles.
1. Adams, S.J.
(1963), “Towards an understanding of inequity”,
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
, Vol. 67 No. 5, pp. 422-436.
2. Adler, N.J.
(1984), “Women in international management: where are they?”,
California Management Review
, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 78-89.
3. Adler, N.J.
(1987), “Pacific basin managers: a gaijin, not a woman”,
Human Resource Management
, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 169-191.
4. Adler, N.J.
and
Bartholomew, S.
(1992), “Managing globally competent people”,
Academy of Management Executive
, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 52-65.
5. Altman, Y.
and
Shortland, S.
(2008), “Women and international assignments: taking stock – a 25-year review”,
Human Resource Management
, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 199-216.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献