How leader bottom-line mentality impedes employee innovative behavior: a Pygmalion effect perspective

Author:

Wang TingxiORCID,Yu Boming,Liu MingweiORCID,Zhou Yue

Abstract

PurposeThe primary purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between leader bottom-line mentality (BLM) and employee innovative behavior, which may be interpreted by employees’ perceived creativity expectations and moderated by employee time orientation.Design/methodology/approachA multi-wave and multi-source questionnaire survey with 259 paired Chinese employee–leader dyads provided data to test the theoretical model. Hypotheses were tested with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).FindingsConsistent with hypotheses, leader BLM reduces employees’ perceived creativity expectations and thus inhibits employees’ innovative behavior, and this effect is stronger for employees with short-term orientation.Practical implicationsOur findings highlight the negative influences of leader BLM on innovative behavior and the buffering role of employees’ long-term orientation. Organizations may incorporate BLM in leadership promotion and evaluation and provide corresponding training for leaders to overcome BLM. In addition, long-term orientation can be a valuable indicator in employee recruitment and selection.Originality/valueThis study contributes to a new theoretical perspective of the Pygmalion effects for understanding leader BLM’s influence on employee innovative behavior.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference44 articles.

1. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework;Journal of Management,2014

2. Whatever it takes: how and when supervisor bottom-line mentality motivates employee contributions in the workplace;Journal of Management,2021

3. Thriving at work but insomniac at home: understanding the relationship between supervisor bottom-line mentality and employee functioning;Human Relations,2022

4. Pygmalion and employee learning: the role of leader behaviors;Journal of Management,2009

5. Brislin, R. (1986), “The wording and translation of research instruments”, in Lonner, W.J. and Berry, J.W. (Eds), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills (CA), Sage.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3