Author:
D'Souza Clare,Taghian Mehdi,Lamb Peter
Abstract
PurposeDespite research studies indicating strong support for labelling information, uncertainty remains with respect to how labels influence consumers. This paper attempts to empirically investigate how consumers who differ in terms of environmentalism respond to labels.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected on an Australian sample using a structured questionnaire administered on the phone using quantum research (CATI) data collection services. A total of 155 questionnaires were completed and used for data analysis. The data were analysed using both descriptive measures and correlations between variables.FindingsThere appears to be a proportion of consumers that find product labels hard to understand. The research found that there are consumers who will buy green products even if they are lower in quality in comparison to alternative products, but would look for environmental information on labels. With respect to price sensitive green consumers, there appears to be a relationship between price sensitivity and “always” reading labels as well as indicating that there is “sufficient” information on product labels to make informed purchase decisions.Research limitations/implicationsIt was beyond the scope of the research to account for some of the utilitarian approaches to interpretation or in‐depth comprehension of label information. The sample size of 155, although selected using a probability method, may, to some extent, limit the overall accuracy of the results.Practical implicationsThe research offers some important information on different green consumer segments that would alert managers on how best to position environmental labels. Findings such as “Satisfied with labels” correlates with “Labels are accurate”, which suggests that businesses need to provide a clear, accurate and easily legible label design to encourage satisfaction with the accuracy of content and the communication aspects of a label.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to better understanding of green customers purchase intentions and the usefulness of ecological product labels. It offers some insights and assistance to businesses in planning their green product/labelling strategies.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference28 articles.
1. Carlson, L., Grove, S. and Kangun, N. (1993), “A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: a matrix method approach”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 27‐40.
2. Caswell, J. and Mojduszka, E. (1996), “Using informational labelling to influence the market for quality in food products”, Working Paper No. 2, Food Marketing Policy Centre, University of Connecticut.
3. Chase, D. and Smith, T.K. (1992), “Consumers keen on green but marketers don't deliver”, Advertising Age, Vol. 63.
4. Dagnoli, J. (1991), “Consciously green”, Advertising Age, Vol. 14.
5. D'Souza, C. (2000), “Bridging the communication gap: dolphin safe eco‐labels”, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 185‐90.
Cited by
312 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献