The ethical evaluation of assistive technology for practitioners: a checklist arising from a participatory study with people with dementia, family and professionals

Author:

Godwin Beatrice

Abstract

PurposeUncertainty over ethical impact may hinder uptake of assistive technology (AT) in dementia. This study aims to examine whether AT contributes to person‐centred care, whether users can participate in research and to explore ethical dilemmas with users, family and professional carers.Design/methodology/approachPeople with dementia, at home or in residential care, and carers were allocated equipment and consulted about ethics. In a small, qualitative study, data were collected using semi‐structured interviews and vignettes and content‐analysed to establish themes.FindingsAT in person‐centred dementia care requires meticulous assessment, reliability and availability in rapidly evolving situations. Users displayed insight, logic and empathy in ethical evaluation. They disliked remote monitoring and surveillance, whereas carers were pragmatic, prioritising safety.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides further evidence that users with dementia can be included in research. It demonstrates a significant potential role for AT in dementia care, with an ethical checklist to help professionals evaluate ethical dilemmas.Originality/valueAT potentially increases wellbeing, enabling users to remain longer at home, delaying or avoiding moves to or between homes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Rehabilitation

Reference35 articles.

1. Abbott, C. (2007), “Defining assistive technologies – a discussion”, Journal of Assistive Technologies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 6‐9.

2. Alzheimer's Society (2011), Assistive Technology Position Paper, available at: www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/download_info.php?fileID=1098 (accessed 24 August 2011).

3. Baldwin, C. (2006), “Reflections on ethics, dementia and technology”, in Woolham, J. (Ed.), Assistive Technology in Dementia Care, Hawker, London, pp. 54‐66.

4. Barnet Health Authority (1997), “The fatal moves”, Working with Older People, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 6‐7.

5. Bharucha, A., Anand, V., Forlizzi, J., Dew, M., Reynolds, C., Stevens, S. and Wactlar, H. (2009), “Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations and future challenges”, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 17, pp. 88‐104.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3