Abstract
PurposeThe aim is to map function into structure step‐by‐step.Design/methodology/approachUsing bio‐inspired approach to investigate generic principle governing the formation of systems or artifacts by analogy with embryogenesis and using matrices and graphs to formalize design information.FindingsA six‐stage design framework is proposed and represented as six models: the function model which interprets design requirements, the surrogate model which transforms the subjective intention into the objective property, the property model which illustrates basic constituents of property, the specification model which specifies abstract properties by concrete property values or equations, the feature model which transforms properties into the feature of topology and materials of the structure, and the parameter model which parameterizes the detail description of structure. The transformations between stages are achieved mainly by means of induction, duality, decision making and nonlinear programming.Research limitations/implicationsBio‐inspired approach provides mechanisms to map function into structure.Practical implicationsA normative framework for engineering design and system design.Originality/valueThe framework distinguishes itself by biological approach, developmental process simulating to the development of embryo, induction and duality strategies to map stages, as well as mathematical representation.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference18 articles.
1. Al‐Hakim, L., Kusiak, A. and Mathew, J. (2000), “A graph‐theoretic approach to conceptual design with functional perspectives”, Computer‐Aided Design, Vol. 32, pp. 867‐75.
2. Dobrjanskyj, L. (1966), “Application of graph theory to the structural classification of mechanism”, PhD dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY.
3. Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2004), “The situated function‐behaviour‐structure framework”, Design Studies, Vol. 25, pp. 373‐91.
4. Kusiak, A. and Szczerbicki, E. (1993), “Transformation from conceptual to embodiment design”, IIE Transaction, Vol. 25, pp. 6‐12.
5. Li, C. and Lieyun, D. (2002), “A method of selecting system core elements based on structure model of system”, Advances in Systems Science and Applications, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 191‐7.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献