Abstract
PurposeTo focus on the topic of ethics and responsibility, specifically on the ethical action of the social worker.Design/methodology/approachConsiders that while ethical questions are discussed in social discourse everywhere, social work in Germany seems to avoid a reformulation of deeply ethical premises. This is perhaps so, because ethics already are implicit in the actions of social work.FindingsThe author believes that the implicit dealing with ethics on the part of the social worker is similar to the “implicit ethics” of Heinz von Foester, which “cannot be articulated”, but are immanent in every action.Originality/valueA consideration of the ethical responsibilities of the social worker.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference14 articles.
1. Bardmann, T.M. (1994), “Zirkularität als Standpunkt: Ein Essay zu Heinz von Foerster: Wissen und Gewissen. Versuch einer Brücke”, Soziologische Revue, Vol. 1, pp. 298‐306.
2. Bradmann, T.M. (1996), “Social Work: ‘profession without qualities’. Attempt to link social work and cybernetics”, Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 205‐14.
3. Bardmann, T.M. (1997), “Wir sind verdammt frei zu sein! – Ein Gespräch mit Heinz von Foerster”, in Bardmann, T.M. (Ed.), Zirkuläre Positionen. Konstruktivismus als praktische Theorie, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 49‐56.
4. Bardmann, T.M., Kersting, H.J., Vogel, H.C. and Woltmann, B. (1991), Irritation als Plan. Konstruktivistische Einredungen, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag des Instituts für Beratung und Supervision, Aachen.
5. Gödel, K. (1931), “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme”, Monatshefte für mathematische Physik, Vol. 38, pp. 172‐98.