The sociological concept of autopoiesis

Author:

Buchinger Eva

Abstract

PurposeTo explore the sociological concept of autopoiesis (N. Luhmann), investigate its interdisciplinary roots and demonstrate its practical relevance.Design/methodology/approachThe biological concept of autopoiesis (H. Maturana/F. Varela) and the philosophical concept of meaning (E. Husserl) are first discussed with respect to their contribution to the development of the sociological concept of autopoiesis. The autopoietic mechanism of three different social systems is then described, and the practical relevance of the sociological concept of autopoiesis demonstrated using the example of governance.FindingsThe scientific positioning of the sociological approach to autopoiesis is two‐fold. On the one hand, it is firmly rooted in the scientific tradition and, on the other, its originality is determined by the adaptation and new combination of existing concepts. Although this adaptation‐combination process has provoked some criticism, the result does matter because it enriches the theoretical and empirical analysis which we use to explain the dynamics of modern societies.Practical implicationsThe application of the sociological concept of autopoiesis to politics gives new insights into the opportunities and barriers of governance processes.Originality/valuePositioning of the sociological concept of autopoiesis within the scientific tradition and its application (beyond metaphorical usage) as an analytical tool.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference21 articles.

1. Beer, S. (1980), “Preface to autopoiesis: the realization of the living”, in Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (Eds), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.

2. Bertalanffy, L.v. (1998), General System Theory, George Braziller, New York, NY.

3. Habermas, J. (1985), Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

4. Husserl, E. (1992a), Logische Untersuchungen: Zweiter Band (HUA XIX/1), Meiner, Hamburg.

5. Husserl, E. (1992b), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie (HUA III/1), Meiner, Hamburg.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3