A construct‐oriented analysis of individual‐level polychronicity-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A construct‐oriented analysis of individual‐level polychronicity

Published:1999-06-01 Issue:3/4 Volume:14 Page:269-288
ISSN:0268-3946
Container-title:Journal of Managerial Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Conte Jeffrey M.,Rizzuto Tracey E.,Steiner Dirk D.

Abstract

This paper provided construct validity evidence for polychronicity in two related studies. Study 1 assessed the relationship between individuals’ stated polychronicity preferences and peer ratings of polychronicity in a multitrait‐multimethod design, which indicated that different raters were able to agree about an individual’s polychronicity. Additional construct validity evidence was provided by linking polychronicity to several potentially related constructs such as achievement striving, impatience/irritability, stress, and performance. In study 2, hypothesized relationships between polychronicity and both time urgency and time management behavior dimensions were supported. In addition, similar relationships between polychronicity and time urgency dimensions were identified across French and US samples. Together, these two studies provide a clearer understanding of the correlates and potential outcomes of polychronicity. Directions for future research are also discussed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference40 articles.

1. Barling, J. and Charbonneau, D. (1992), “Disentangling the relationship between the achievement strivings and impatience‐irritability dimensions of Type A behavior, performance, and health”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 369‐77

2. Bluedorn, A.C. and Denhardt, R.B. (1988), “Time and organizations”, Journal of Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 299‐320.

3. Bluedorn, A.C., Kaufman, C.F. and Lane, P.M. (1992), “How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 17‐26.

4. Bluedorn, A.C., Kalliath, T.J., Strube, M.J and Martin, G.D. (1999), “Polychronicity: a fundamental dimension of organizational culture”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 14 Nos. 3/4, pp. 205‐30.

5. Bluen, S.D., Barling, J. and Burns, W. (1990), “Predicting sales performance, job satisfaction, and depression by using the achievement strivings and impatience‐irritability dimensions of Type A behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75 No. 2, pp. 212‐16.

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Polychronicity fit and turnover intentions in projects: the mediating roles of exhaustion and work overload;International Journal of Manpower;2024-05-06

2. Staticity and Chronicity;Misunderstandings About Non-Verbal Communication;2023

3. CEO polychronicity and SME internationalization;Multinational Business Review;2022-05-10

4. It’s About Time: Understanding Job Crafting Through the Lens of Individuals’ Temporal Characteristics;Group & Organization Management;2022-03-28

5. Effects of sexual harassment on work–family enrichment: the roles of organization-based self-esteem and Polychronicity;Asia Pacific Journal of Management;2021-09-02