The familiarity and use of reference management software by LIS faculties in Iran

Author:

Sarrafzadeh Maryam,Hazeri Afsaneh

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of the present paper is to investigate the familiarity and use of reference management software (RMS) by library and information science (LIS) faculties in Iran, and aims to identify the possible factors that lead to the application and choice of this software. Design/methodology/approach – This is a descriptive survey. Data collected by a Web-based questionnaire include both open-ended and multiple-choice questions. The questionnaires were distributed among LIS discussion groups and were sent to the e-mails of LIS faculties. Findings – Results reveal that over half of the respondents had a good familiarity with the various citation software packages and knew how to use them; 35 per cent of respondents have learned how to use these packages through formal education. “Endnote” is the most popular software among respondents. Respondents confirm the need to offer some educational programs on how to use these software packages to bachelor students, and nominated the “Academic Writing” course as the proper place for teaching this topic. Originality/value – If due attention is given to the importance of referencing in academic writing and to establishing criteria for the acceptance of papers for publication, teaching students how to carry out referencing and how to use RMS packages for this purpose will aid the promotion of scientific products. To determine whether LIS educators are able to teach the use of RMS packages, it is necessary to examine the extent to which they are familiar with these programs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference23 articles.

1. ACRL (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency (accessed 2 February 2014).

2. Antonijevi, and Cahoy, E.S. (2014), “Personal library curation: an ethnographic study of scholars’ information practices”, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 287-306.

3. Childress, D. (2011), “Citation tools in academic libraries”, Reference & User Services Quarterly, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 143-152.

4. East, J.W. (2001), “Academic libraries and the provision of support for users of personal bibliographic software: a survey of Australian experience with EndNote”, LASIE (Library Automated Systems Information Exchange), Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 64-70.

5. Fenner, M. , Kaja, S. and Sönke, B. (2014), Reference Management Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, Springer, London, pp. 125-138.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3