Abstract
Clients engage consultants for many reasons, not always successfully. Based on a literature review and client and consultant interviews, this paper suggests six universal factors ‐‐ stated as testable propositions ‐‐ to help explain consulting engagement success. The factors are consultant integrity ‐‐ in particular in putting the client’s interests first, client involvement and readiness to change, a clear agreement concerning requirements and expectations, client control of the engagement ‐‐ partly via clear and limited assignments, consultant competence, and a good fit along a number of dimensions ‐‐ including models of consultancy, client expectations, consultant capabilities, and consultant type. The paper also addresses the distinction between organisation development consultation and other types of management consulting and concludes that the distinction need not be so sharp.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference45 articles.
1. Akkermans, H. (1995), “Developing a logistics strategy through participative business modelling”, International Journal of Operations > Production Management, Vol. 15 No. 11, pp. 100‐12.
2. Armenakis, A.A. and Burdg, H.B. (1988), “Consultation research: contributions to practice and directions for improvement”, Journal of Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 339‐65.
3. Bazigos, M.N. and Burke, W.W. (1997), “Theory orientations of organization development (OD) practitioners”, Group > Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 384‐408.
4. Beckhard, R. (1969), Developing Organisations: Diagnosis and Action, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. Bell, C.R. (1985), “Towards a philosophy of HRD consulting”, in Bell, C.R. and Nadler, L. (Eds), Clients and Consultants: Meeting and Exceeding Expectations, Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, TX, pp. 305‐13
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献