Abstract
An examination of managerial rule breaking is potentially significant in times of rapid change where advantages have to be gained through flexibility and the effective use of power. This paper is based on a study of middle managers with professional backgrounds in public and private UK health care organizations. It analyses managers’ responses to rules and identifies to what extent they accept, subvert or reinterpret rules, ignore or hide rules, create new rules or manage without rules at all. The conclusion is reached that, within certain organizational, professional, gender and personal parameters, managers demonstrate great versatility. It is suggested that it is not the decision to avoid rules, nor the selection of particular ways to manipulate rules that is significant, but it is the ability of managers to move freely across different modes of behaviour as they deem appropriate that marks out successful opportunistic action.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference15 articles.
1. Althusser, L. (1977), Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 2nd ed., NLB, London.
2. Brower, R. and Abolafia, M. (1995), “The structured embeddedness of resistance among public managers”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, June, pp. 149‐66.
3. Brown, A. (1995), Organisational Culture, Pitman, London.
4. Child, J. (1984), Organization: A Guide to Practice and Problems, Harper & Row, London.
5. Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997), The Managerial State, Sage, London.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献