Knowing and improving paraphrasing skills of Mexican college students

Author:

Cortes-Vera Jesus,Garcia Thelma J.,Gutierrez Alan

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop both an activity and an instrument to support college students’ learning of the proper ways to paraphrase. Design/methodology/approach This study used a participatory action research approach, consisting of four phases. A survey was used to collect information, as well as a rubric to evaluate students’ competencies in paraphrasing, before and after an educational intervention activity. The tools were designed by the authors. Findings The findings suggest that students only have a partial understanding of the elements that are needed to write an adequate paraphrase, despite the declared importance in academic dialogue by the majority of them. The findings also suggest that a short-range intervention can help students develop their skills in paraphrasing. Research limitations/implications This research was conducted mostly with a small group of first-year college students and a professor they have known for a year. Therefore, a level of trust had been established. This trust relationship is necessary to achieve a participatory action in an unscheduled activity. Only some of the major results are presented. Originality/value Little actual research has been conducted on college students’ perception on paraphrasing and its importance, as well as on their abilities to paraphrase, especially in the Latin American context. This study demonstrates the usefulness of a short-range intervention that can be easily applied in any course or information literacy program.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Education

Reference35 articles.

1. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education: standards, performance indicators, and outcomes”, ACRL, American Library Association, Chicago, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf (accessed 25 July 2017).

2. Use of action research to improve information literacy acquisition of international ESL students;New Library World,2016

3. Librarians as writing instructors: using paraphrasing exercises to teach beginning information literacy students;The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2006

4. Bundy, A. (2004), “Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework principles, standards and practice”, Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy, Adelaide, available at: www.anziil.org/resources/Info%20lit%202nd%20edition.pdf (accessed 25 July 2017).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3