Revisiting interlibrary loan best practices: still viable?

Author:

Kochan Carol,Leon Lars

Abstract

Purpose – This paper seeks to evaluate the impact of the Group Interlibrary Loan Best Practices instituted by the Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) Libraries in 2002 and to examine whether these best practices are still viable today. The authors aims to provide an updated discussion on current best practices in both GWLA and other highly effective library consortia. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use a case study approach to identify areas where interlibrary loan best practices have improved service amongst the GWLA Libraries. In addition, the practices of other high performing consortia are included to further the discussion. Findings – The GWLA Libraries found that the best practices implemented in 2002 improved service by decreasing turnaround time and increasing patron access to alternate format types. Other library consortia are also using similar group best practices that improve resource sharing. Research limitations/implications – This article focuses mostly on the beneficial outcomes of the best practices and limits discussion of the problems and pitfalls encountered. Originality/value – Readers will gain an understanding of how instituting group best practices can improve interlibrary loan service and recognize the benefit of library groups.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference17 articles.

1. Anderson, R. (2012), “To share or not to share? Peer to peer review”, Library Journal, Oct 25, available at: http://lj.libraryjournal.com (accessed 23 July 2013).

2. Collins, P. (2012), “Fear and loathing in cooperative collection development”, Interlending & Document Supply, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 100-104.

3. Goergen-Doll, K. (2013), personal correspondence, 22 July.

4. Green, T. (2013), personal correspondence, 22 July.

5. Jackson, M. (1998), Measuring the Performance of Interlibrary Loan Operations in North American Research and College Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3