Evolution of admission standards in response to curriculum integration

Author:

Lawrence John J.,Pharr Steven

Abstract

Admission standards are commonly employed as a means of maintaining the quality of an academic program’s student pool, and as a result, the program itself. The past decade has seen a number of efforts to integrate academic content and incorporate models of team‐based learning. While the emphasis and demands of these programs have changed, as well as the expectations of incoming students, admission standards have not. This study considers whether undergraduate business admission requirements developed and validated for traditional curricula remain valid admission standards for integrated programs. The relationship between student performance in various predictor courses and performance in upper level business courses is compared for students in an integrated program and those taking the traditional curriculum. Results indicate that the traditional predictor courses remain valid predictors of performance for the integrated program. Additionally, opportunities for improvement exist in the addition of courses emphasizing communication and reasoning skills.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference15 articles.

1. Brown, K.H., McCormick, K. and Abraham, F. (2002), “The principles of macroeconomics course as an early predictor of undergraduate business school performance”, Journal of the Academy of Business Education, Vol. 3, Fall, pp. 61‐9.

2. Byrne, J. (1993), “Harvard B‐school: an American institution in need of reform”, Business Week, 19 July, pp. 58‐65.

3. Closs, D.J. and Stank, T.P. (1999), “A cross‐functional curriculum for supply chain education at Michigan State University”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 20, Spring, pp. 59‐66.

4. Davidson, A.B. and Gohmann, S.F. (2000), “Differences in predictors of grade point average for internal and external Master of Business Administration students”, Journal of Business Education, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 24‐32.

5. DeMoranville, C., Aurand, T.W. and Gordon, G.L. (2000), “The delivery of an undergraduate, cross‐functional business principles program: one university’s continuing program”, Marketing Education Review, Vol. 10, Fall, pp. 29‐41.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3