Author:
Durach Christian F.,Wieland Andreas,Machuca Jose A.D.
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide groundwork for an emerging theory of supply chain robustness – which has been conceptualized as a dimension of supply chain resilience – through reviewing and synthesizing related yet disconnected studies. The paper develops a formal definition of supply chain robustness to build a framework that captures the dimensions, antecedents and moderators of the construct as discussed in the literature.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors apply a systematic literature review approach. In order to reduce researcher bias, they involve a team of academics, librarians and managers.
Findings
– The paper first, provides a formal definition of supply chain robustness; second, builds a theoretical framework of supply chain robustness that augments both causal and descriptive knowledge; third,shows how findings in this review support practice; and fourth,reveals methodological insights on the use of journal rankings in reviews.
Research limitations/implications
– At this stage, managers may benefit from seeing these relationships as clues derived from the literature. The paper is fundamentally a call for researchers to conduct quantitative testing of such relationships to derive more reliable understanding and practical applications.
Practical implications
– Rather than presenting empirical findings, this paper reveals to managers that visibility, risk management orientation and reduced network complexity have been the main predictive antecedents of supply chain robustness (as discussed in the academic literature). This provides a potentially important signal as to where to invest resources.
Originality/value
– The study is the first to develop a formal definition of supply chain robustness and to establish a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding the construct.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation
Reference85 articles.
1. *Indicates the paper is included in the review.
2. *
Abercrombie, G.
(2007), “Who’s your weak link?”,
Harvard Business Review
, Vol. 85 No. 12, pp. 15-16.
3. Asbjørnslett, B.E.
and
Rausand, M.
(1999), “Assess the vulnerability of your production system”,
Production Planning & Control
, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 219-229.
4. *
Azadegan, A.
,
Patel, P.C.
,
Zangoueinezhad, A.
and
Linderman, K.
(2013), “The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices”,
Journal of Operations Management
, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 193-212.
5. *
Baghalian, A.
,
Rezapour, S.
and
Farahani, R.Z.
(2013), “Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: a real-life case”,
European Journal of Operational Research
, Vol. 227 No. 1, pp. 199-215.
Cited by
190 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献