Operationalising place‐based innovation in public administration

Author:

Adams David,Hess Michael

Abstract

PurposePlace‐based innovation has become central to meeting the complex demands on contemporary public administration. Among the difficulties in introducing new practices is the gap between political authorisation and administrative implementation. This paper aims to use the emergence of new forms of place‐based public administration involved in the (re)introduction of community‐based ideas, practices and instruments into public administration to demonstrate how authorising and operationalising innovation can be addressed in practice.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews placed‐based public administration initiatives in Victoria, Australia over a decade.FindingsTo be effective public sector innovations need both a powerful authorising environment and also a framework for operationalisation. As with private sector innovation new ideas in the public sector often need new institutional arrangements and instruments to enable their effective take up and diffusion. These new arrangements often require the “creative destruction” of previous ways of thinking and working.Originality/valueThis paper contains evidence of new place‐based approaches to public management, that could be of interest to other states and countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Strategy and Management,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development,Business and International Management

Reference38 articles.

1. Adams, D. and Hess, M. (2006), “New research instruments for government: measuring community engagement”, in Duke, C., Doyle, L. and Wilson, B. (Eds), Making Knowledge Work: Sustaining Learning Communities and Regions, National Institute of Adult Continuing Education, Leicester, pp. 67‐83.

2. Alford, J. and O'Neill, D. (Eds) (1994), The Contract State: Public Management and the Kennett Government, Deakin University, Geelong.

3. Bentley, T. and Wilsdon, J. (Eds) (2003), The Adaptive State: Strategies for Personalising the Public Realm, DEMOS, London.

4. Blacher, Y. and Adams, D. (2007), “Working together for stronger Victorian communities”, in Parker, S. and Gallagher, N. (Eds), The Collaborative State, DEMOS, London, pp. 71‐87.

5. Blair, T. (1998), The Third Way, Fabian Society, London.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3