Dynamic modelling of national healthcare system

Author:

Jankuj Miroslav,Voracek Jan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discover and structurally represent the overall possibilities and limitations of quality phenomenon in national health-care sector. The authors consider this domain as a whole and also deal with cross-sector relations, which are usually simplified or omitted. Design/methodology/approach – Presented problem represents a macro-level strategy planning task. The authors use the tools of system dynamics and the basic methodology consists of four generic stages, including problem formulation, conceptual specifications, computational modeling and experimentation. Findings – The authors propose architecture of quality-driven simulation model of national health-care system, validated by simple computational prototype. It covers all major players in this sector, i.e. patients, hospitals, government and insurers. Practical implications – The proposed model can be very useful, especially for current and future policymakers, as a tool for decision-making. They can create better decisions based on the knowledge of a wide variety of factors influencing the system and thus achieve the public health objectives more effectively. Originality/value – The innovativeness of presented research is based on an assumption that strategic concentration on quality in health-care sector can solve the majority of its current bottlenecks. According to the interpretation of the authors, qualitative aspects include primarily the non-clinical activities, such as management, marketing, external relations or staff development.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. Baghbanian, A. and Torkfar, G. (2012), “Economics and resourcing of complex healthcare systems”, Australian Health Review , Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 394-400.

2. Begun, J.W. , Zimmerman, B. and Dooley, K. (2003), “Health care organizations as complex adaptive systems”, in Mick, S.M. and Wyttenbach, M. (eds), Advances in Health Care Organization Theory , Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 253-288.

3. Cavana, R.Y. , Davies, P.K. , Robson, R.M. and Wilson, K.J. (1999), “Drivers of quality in health services: different worldviews of clinicians and policy managers revealed”, System Dynamics Review , Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 331-340.

4. Chahal, H. and Kumari, N. (2012), “Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale in hospitals in the Indian context”, International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing , Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 167-190.

5. Chen, K. and Chuang, K. (2013), “Using systems thinking to analyse health care in the United States: should we move to a government sponsored health care system?”, Academy of Health Care Management Journal , Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 3-12.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3