Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine distinctions between embeddedness and belonging in ethnographic fieldwork to make sense of a researcher's identity position in the field.
Design/methodology/approach
– A confessional ethnographic narrative was retrospectively crafted from field notes from a 12-month fieldwork period. This narrative is presented and critically discussed to problematize the author's remembered sense of place and temporality in the field.
Findings
– Regardless of whether a researcher “longs to belong” in the field, the paper finds that the research and the researcher belongs to the field. The temporality of an ethnographer's being in the field causes its inhabitants, the research participants to assign him/her a distinct and hybrid identity position.
Research limitations/implications
– It is recognized that the research presented is bound by nostalgia. However, such reflexive intersubjectivity must be accounted for in ethnography. The identity position of a researcher influences the research process and outcomes. And that identity is not at the discretion of the researcher.
Originality/value
– Adopting the trope of habitus and postcolonial principles, this research illustrates the criticality of reflexive intersubjectivity in ethnography to positioning the researcher as “Other,” not the research participants. For organizational ethnographers, and qualitative researchers more widely, to recognize this ethical consideration has consequences for how fieldwork is practiced and reported.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference66 articles.
1. Abu-Lughod, L.
(1991), “Writing Against Culture”, in
Fox, R.J.
(Ed.) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 137-162.
2. Alvesson, M.
and
Willmott, H.
(2002), “Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 619-644.
3. Alvesson, M.
,
Hardy, C.
and
Harley, B.
(2008), “Reflecting on reflexivity: reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 480-501.
4. Archer, L.
(2008), “Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 385-403.
5. Ashcraft, K.L.
(2007), “Appreciating the ‘work’ of discourse: occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots”, Discourse & Communication, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 9-36.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献