Author:
Brenninkmeijer Veerle,Hekkert-Koning Marleen
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine relationships between regulatory focus, job crafting, work engagement and perceived employability. Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between promotion-focused individuals, who strive for growth and development, and prevention-focussed individuals, who strive for security. Job crafting refers to changes that individuals make in their work to meet their own preferences and needs. It was expected that job crafting would mediate associations between promotion focus and work-related outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach
– Questionnaires were collected among 383 registered candidates from a consultancy organization for recruitment, assessment and coaching that operates within the branches pharmacy, medical devices, food, and healthcare. Results were analyzed using structural equation modeling.
Findings
– Crafting structural and social resources were positively related to work engagement and employability, whereas negative relationships were found for crafting hindering demands. Promotion focus was associated with crafting resources and challenging demands, while prevention focus was associated with crafting hindering demands. Job crafting also mediated some of the relationships between promotion focus, prevention focus and work outcomes.
Research limitations/implications
– This study provided insight into possible antecedents and outcomes of job crafting. Unfortunately, this study used a cross-sectional design.
Practical implications
– These insights may help managers to encourage beneficial job crafting behaviors, while taking individuals’ foci into account.
Originality/value
– This study has provided insight in the relationships between regulatory focus, job crafting, work engagement, and perceived employability.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference37 articles.
1. Akkermans, T.J.
,
Brenninkmeijer, V.
,
Huibers, M.
and
Blonk, R.W.B.
(2013). “Competencies for the contemporary career: development and preliminary validation of the career competencies questionnaire”,
Journal of Career Development
, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 245-267.
2. Bakker, A.B.
and
Demerouti, E.
(2007), “The job demands–resources model: state of the art”,
Journal of Managerial Psychology
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 309-328.
3. Bakker, A.B.
,
Hakanen, J.J.
,
Demerouti, E.
and
Xanthopoulou, D.
(2007), “Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high”,
Journal of Educational Psychology
, Vol. 99 No. 2, pp. 274-284.
4. Bakker, A.B.
,
Schaufeli, W.B.
,
Leiter, M.P.
and
Taris, T.W.
(2008), “Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology”,
Work & Stress
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 187-200.
5. Berg, J.M.
,
Dutton, J.E.
and
Wrzesniewski, A.
(2008), “What is job crafting and why does it matter”, available at: http://positiveorgs.bus.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/What-is-Job-Crafting-and-Why-Does-it-Matter1.pdf (accessed 13 February 2014).
Cited by
96 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献