Abstract
PurposeExchange rate uncertainty leads to an indecisive environment for imports and exports that would condense international trade, foreign direct investment, trade earnings, trade volumes, economic growth and welfare. This study aims to examine, empirically, the effect of exchange rate uncertainty on bilateral trade performance, focusing on eight SAARC member economies using the popular modified gravity model of trade.Design/methodology/approachThe paper includes eight SAARC members – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka panel data set over the period 2005–2018. The authors consider both standardized value (standard deviation) and conditional variance model to determine volatility of exchange rate. Primarily, ordinary least squares, random effects and fixed effects estimation techniques are employed to investigate the impact of exchange rate volatility. Endogeneity and robustness of the findings have been tested using the simultaneity-adjusted model and dynamic panel data two-step system GMM estimation techniques.FindingsEmpirical findings endorse the view that exchange rate volatility lowers trade flows in the SAARC regions. However, this adverse effect of exchange rate uncertainty on trade is pretty small. The negative correlation between exchange rate volatility and bilateral trade remains consistent and significant after controlling of simultaneous causality, autocorrelation, year effects, country-pair heterogeneity and endogeneity irrespective of panel data estimation techniques and different measures of volatility.Originality/valueThe present paper is original work.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,History,Cultural Studies,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Exchange-rate volatility and Malaysian-Thai bilateral industry trade flows;Journal of Economic Studies,2017
2. Exchange rate volatility and international trade: international evidence from the MINT countries;Economic Modelling,2016
3. Exchange rate volatility in the Eurozone,2019
4. Banik, N. and Gilbert, J. (2008), “Regional integration and trade costs in South Asia”, ADBI Working Paper 127.
5. Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1995), “Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA”, NBER Working Paper No. 5283.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献