Author:
Chan Chung Shing,Peters Mike,Pikkemaat Birgit
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to understand the perceptions of visitors in terms of multiple aspects of smart cities to allow wise decisions to be made about smart tourist destinations by municipal governments and tourism authorities.
Design/methodology/approach
This study takes a sample of inbound visitors (n=205) from Hong Kong as an empirical questionnaire-based survey on visitors’ perceptions of these smart city attributes, which are collected from literature, and framed in Cohen’s Smart City Wheel.
Findings
This paper identifies the distinctive factors for branding Hong Kong as a smart city. The results from the factor analysis identify four factors for determining what a smart city is from the perspective of visitors, namely, the quality of a smart society: energy consumption in an urban environment, smart city governance and smart city livelihood. The first two factors further become the determinants of a successful smart city brand considered by visitors, which contribute to their locational decisions and thus the strategies and policies of smart destination branding.
Research limitations/implications
The results obtained can serve as insights for tourism policy makers and destination marketers when considering significant information and communication technology, or other smart and sustainable attributes for city branding (e.g. Buhalis and Amaranggana, 2014; Marine-Roig and Anton Clavé, 2015), as well as common investment and resource allocation for shared benefits in similar metropolises.
Practical implications
The smartness factors represent important dimensions of urban smartness as prioritized areas for further development, innovation and marketing of tourism industries and enterprises in Hong Kong, as a mature urban destination incorporating the branding of a proposed smart district as a strategy of urban development.
Originality/value
Smart urban development and tourism development have increasingly become inseparable, especially when visitors utilize cities as tourist destinations but share other urban resources and spaces with local citizens. Unlike the development of smart tourist attractions, smart tourist destinations should have a wider scope of smartness. A smart tourist destination may carry similar and overlapping characteristics of smart cities, which may be interpreted by visitors and may eventually affect their perceived image of a city.
Subject
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Geography, Planning and Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference100 articles.
1. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?;Cities,2017
2. Smart city policies: a spatial approach;Cities,2014
3. Anthopoulos, L. (2015), “Understanding the smart city domain: a literature review”, in Bolivar, M.P. (Ed.), Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities, Public Administration and Information Technology Series, Vol. 3, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, pp. 9-21.
4. A unified smart city model (USCM) for smart city conceptualization and benchmarking;International Journal of Electronic Government Research,2016
5. A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona;Journal of Knowledge Economy,2013
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献