Sectoral decision making: structures, processes and trust

Author:

Henderson Sybil S.,Smith-King Erma Jean

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to synthesize multi-sector, cross-sector, and other interorganizational alliance structures and processes with particular focus on their saliency in partnership/alliance decision making. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper focusing primarily on management and public administration literature that examines decision making in multi-sector, cross-sector, and other interorganizational alliances. Findings – The paper identified that decision making takes place at every stage of the partnership process, with complexity being dependent on organizational structure and design, i.e. dyad or network. Organization structures and key processes including coordination, cooperation, and trust are critical elements that impact decision making. Trust is foundational for the development and sustainability of collaborative alliances. Many of these same characteristics are also found in strategic alliance structures and processes. Practical implications – This analysis of selected literature on decision making and trust has the capacity to enhance awareness and expectation-setting for those entering a collaborative partnership. Trust is an integral and enduring component at every stage. Originality/value – This study crosses the boundary between sectoral partnerships and other interorganizational alliances in the analysis of decision-making structures and processes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference95 articles.

1. Agranoff, R. (2004), “Leveraging networks: a guide for public managers working across organizations”, in Kamensky, J. and Burlin, T. (Eds), Collaboration Using Partnerships and Networks , Rowman and Littlefield, New York, NY, pp. 61-102.

2. Agranoff, R. and McGuire, M. (2001), “Big questions in public network management research”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 295-326.

3. Albers, S. (2010), “Configurations of alliance governance systems”, Schmalenbach Business Review , Vol. 62 No. 10, pp. 202-232.

4. Albers, S. , Wohlgezogen, R. and Zajac, E.J. (2013), “Strategic alliance structures: an organization design perspective”, Journal of Management , Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1-33.

5. Aldrich, H.E. and Herker, D. (1977), “Boundary spanning roles and organization structure”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 2, pp. 217-230.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3