Shaping innovation and coordination of healthcare delivery across boundaries and borders

Author:

Hollick Rosemary J.,Black Alison J.,Reid David M.,McKee Lorna

Abstract

Purpose Using a complexity-informed approach, we aim to understand why introduction of a mobile service delivery model for osteoporosis across diverse organisational and country contexts in the UK National Health Service (NHS) met with variable success. Design/methodology/approach Six comparative case studies; three prospectively in Scotland using an action research-informed approach; and three retrospectively in England with variable degrees of success. The Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability framework explored interactions between multi-level contextual factors and their influence on efforts to introduce and sustain services. Findings Cross-boundary service development was a continuous process of adaptation and evolution in rapidly shifting healthcare context. Whilst the outer healthcare policy context differed significantly across cases, inner contextual features predominated in shaping the success or otherwise of service innovations. Technical and logistical issues, organisational resources, patient and staff actions combined in unpredictable ways to shape the lifecycle of service change. Patient and staff thoughts about place and access to services actively shaped service development. The use of tacit “soft intelligence” and a sense of “chronic unease” emerged as important in successfully navigating around awkward people and places. Practical implications “Chronic unease” and “soft intelligence” can be used to help individuals and organisations “tame” complexity, identify hidden threats and opportunities to achieving change in a particular context, and anticipate how these may change over time. Understanding how patients think and feel about where, when and how care is delivered provides unique insights into previously unseen aspects of context, and can usefully inform development and sustainability of patient-centred healthcare services. Originality/value This study has uniquely traced the fortunes of a single service innovation across diverse organisational and country contexts. Novel application of the NASSS framework enabled comparative analysis across real-time service change and historical failures. This study also adds to theories of context and complexity by surfacing the neglected role of patients in shaping healthcare context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference48 articles.

1. Adeosun, C., McKee, L. and Homans, H. (2017), “Stakeholders’ involvement and service users’ acceptance in the implementation of new practice guidelines”, in McDermott, A., Kitchener, M. and Exworthy, M. (Eds), Managing Improvement in Healthcare: Attaining, Sustaining and Spreading Quality, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 275-294.

2. When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change;BMC Medicine,2018

3. Cylus, J., Richardson, E., Findley, L., Longley, M., O’Neill, C. and Steel, D. (2015), “United Kingdom: health system review”, Health Systems in Transition, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 1-125.

4. Dayan, M. and Edwards, N. (2017), “Learning from Scotland’s NHS”, research report, available at: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research (accessed 15 May 2019).

5. Dixon-Woods, M. (2014), “The problem of context in quality improvement”, Perspectives on Context, The Health Foundation, London, pp. 89-101.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3