An examination of strategies employed for the integration of management systems

Author:

Asif Muhammad,Fisscher Olaf A.M.,Joost de Bruijn Erik,Pagell Mark

Abstract

PurposeThis paper is an empirical study of the organisational approaches used for integration of management systems (MSs) and the comparative effectiveness of such approaches.Design/methodology/approachResearch employed four case studies. Results are derived from the analysis of triangulated evidence obtained from in‐depth interviews, observations, internal documents analysis, archives, and short questionnaires.FindingsResults identified two archetypes of integration strategies termed “systems approach” and “techno‐centric approach”. Maximum benefits are achieved by using a systems approach to integration of MSs, while using the techno‐centric approach leads to benefits mainly at the operational level.Research limitations/implicationsThis research is qualitative and, as such, does not investigate the integration of MSs across a large number of organisations. The research does not investigate the causality between strategies employed for integration and their outcomes.Originality/valueThere is little empirical research to date on the strategies employed for integration of MSs and their effectiveness. This research contributes to both literature and practice by demonstrating that a systems approach gives rise to greater integration throughout various organisational levels and greater benefits as compared to other approaches.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How The TQM Journal has addressed “quality”: a literature review using bibliometric analysis;The TQM Journal;2023-02-24

2. The role of competency-based certification in ensuring sustainable project delivery;Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal;2023-01-01

3. Sistemas Integrados de Gestión: un análisis bibliométrico;Revista Venezolana de Gerencia;2022-05-09

4. New challenges in supply chain management: cybersecurity across the supply chain;International Journal of Production Research;2021-10-12

5. Integrated management systems as a driver of sustainability performance: exploring evidence from multiple-case studies;International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management;2020-07-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3