The applicability of quality management systems and models to higher education

Author:

Mehralizadeh Yadollah,Safaeemoghaddam Massoud

Abstract

PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is study to what extent the idea of a total quality management (TQM) system (Deming, ISO, Baldrige, and EFQM) which is borrowed from business is applicable in a higher education institution.Design/methodology/approachA meta‐evaluation methodology is used which emphasises Røvik's seven theoretical assumptions on how management ideas are spread in a given sector.FindingsThe findings of this paper reveal that that in many cases the current evidence of application of TQM is not compatible with the assumed criteria of the Røvik model. The quality systems are not often socially acceptable, they do not follow a clear philosophy and theory, do not show the productivity of institutions, are less progressive, have low harmonies, unrealistically publicized but in terms of individualized aspects there are some supportive successful case applied in non‐academic higher education.Originality/valueThe value and new message of this paper is its investigation of the fitness of TQM from a new perspective based on meta‐analysis.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference61 articles.

1. Avdjieva, M. and Wilson, M. (2002), “Exploring the development of quality in higher education”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 372‐83.

2. Ball, C. (1985), in Urwin, D. (Ed.), Fitness for Purpose. Essays in Higher Education, SRHE and NFER‐Nelson, Guildford.

3. Banta, T.W. (1995), “Some observations about the assessment of quality worldwide”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Tampere, Finland, July 1995, pp. vii/viii.

4. Becket, N. and Brookes, M. (2005), “Analysing quality audits in higher education”, Brookes Ejournal of Learning and Teaching, Vol. 1 No. 2, available at: www.brookes.ac.uk/publications/bejlt/volume1issue2/academic/becket_brookes.html.

5. Birnbaum, R. (2000), Management Fads in Higher Education: Where do They Come From, What They Do, Why They Fail, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3