Improving construction productivity: a subcontractor's perspective

Author:

Loosemore Martin

Abstract

Purpose – Surprisingly, given the prominence and front-line role of subcontractors in the construction industry, their perspective is almost completely absent from construction productivity literature. Existing research in this area presents a highly one-sided principal contractor perspective and there are very few insights into what subcontractors think. The purpose of this paper is to address the imbalance by investigating the determinants of construction productivity from a subcontractor's perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Focus groups with 71 of Australia's leading tier-one subcontractors were conducted with the aim of exploring their insights into the productivity challenge. Findings – The findings indicate that the main determinants of productivity for subcontractors are: the quality of relationships with principal contractors; opportunity for early involvement in design; transparent tender practices; growing administration and document control; design management; project management and supervisory skills, particularly in planning, scheduling and coordination; risk management and; industrial relations (IR). Research limitations/implications – This research was conducted in Australia and similar research needs to be conducted in other countries to cross-reference and validate the results more widely. Practical implications – In practical terms, a “culture” of productivity improvement will need to be “nurtured” across the business and supply chain if productivity is to be improved. In particular contractors should avoid bid shopping, respect subcontractor IP and talk to subcontractors earlier in a project. Social implications – By respecting the opinions of subcontractors who employ the vast majority of workers in the construction industry, productivity and employment can be increased. Originality/value – The focus group results add significantly to a more balanced understanding of what has hitherto been a one-sided principal contractor focused debate.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference57 articles.

1. Abbott, C. , Barrett, P. , Ruddock, L. and Sexton, M. (2007), “Hidden innovation in the construction and property sectors”, RICS Research Paper Series, Vol. 7 No. 20.

2. Abbot, C. and Carson, C. (2012), “A review of productivity analysis of the New Zealand construction industry”, Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 1-15.

3. Abdel-Wahab, M. and Vogi, B. (2011), “Trends in productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 635-644.

4. Abdel-Wahab, M.S. , Dainty, A.R.J. and Ison, S.G. (2006), “How productive is the construction industry?”, in Boyd, D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual ARCOM Conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Birmingham, 4-6 September, pp. 11-19.

5. AIG (2008), State of Play: The Australian Construction Industry in 2008, Australian Industry Group and Australian Constructors Association, Sydney.

Cited by 79 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Implementing Sustainable Construction Practices in the Jordanian Housing Industry;Journal of Sustainable Real Estate;2024-01-22

2. Mathematical modelling and simulation in construction supply chain management;Automation in Construction;2023-12

3. Review of Construction Methods used in Ongoing Projects in Nile University Campus: Adapting Proposed Modern Technology;2023 2nd International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering and Applied Science (ICMEAS);2023-11-01

4. Task planning and control in construction: revealing workers as early and late planners;Construction Management and Economics;2023-10-19

5. Drywall Installers’ Work Demands – Tackling between Normal Duties and Absurd Challenges;Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2023;2023-09-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3