Abstract
Purpose
– This contribution aims to clarify the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an issue of governance and a strategic tool more than a mere communication activity, with a potential impact on both organizations and their economic and financial performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper provides an overview of the literature contribution on CSR and its impact on value, offering a new conceptual model useful both for managers and relevant stakeholders in assessing, through an integrated approach, the company performance.
Findings
– The analysis focuses on how CSR investments can create value for companies and for stakeholders in general. This can occur if the related benefits exceed the related costs, generating a favorable balance toward what we called the virtuous cycle of CSR. This cycle is made up of four steps – decision, design, action and result – that define a potential value creation path that a responsible firm can take, assuming that it integrates a social agenda into its competitive strategy and assuming that the market appreciates real and effective social efforts of companies.
Research limitations/implications
– Because the descriptive chosen approach, the research could be enriched with a quantitative analysis to test the proposed propositions further.
Originality/value
– This paper fulfils the need, identified in the major literature, of a temporary ceasefire on corporate social performance and its link to financial performance, focusing on tools and instruments that can practically modify the companies' approach to CSR and the evaluation processes of its impact on business, strategy and disclosure.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference121 articles.
1. Adams, C.A.
and
Frost, G.
(2008), “Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 288-302.
2. Adams, C.A.
and
Larrinaga-Gonzàlez, C.
(2007), “Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accountability and performance”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 333-355.
3. Aguilera, R.
,
Rupp, D.
,
Williams, C.
and
Ganapathi, J.
(2007), “Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 836-863.
4. Anderson, J.
and
Frankle, A.
(1980), “Voluntary social report: an iso-beta portfolio analysis”, Accounting Review, Vol. 55, pp. 468-479.
5. Angel, J.J.
and
Rivoli, P.
(1997), “Does ethical investing impose a cost upon the firm? A theoretical perspective”, Journal of Investing, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 57-64.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献