Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to conceptualise a dynamic model on the impact on office space and its boundaries of growth firms due to studied factors subject to fluctuations of business cycles.Design/methodology/approachTheories are based on a literature study on space relation to business cycles, entrepreneurial theories and the service‐oriented society of today. The data are collected from an extensive study of pre‐classified growth firms from all major business sectors in Sweden during the period 1998‐2003, which is studied as an upturn and a downturn period. The study is related to a questionnaire distributed to entire Sweden of 967 listed firms where the response rate was 40 per cent. Investigated factors are: fluctuations of GDP, outsourcing events of core business, events of mergers and acquisitions (Ms&As), creation of subsidiaries, proportion of office workers and temporary staff in offices.FindingsThe detected significant correlations of the survey give a platform for a model that indicates that opposite but various forces due to business cycles seem to adjust the space after the events of outsourcing or M&A.Research limitations/implicationsThe study could fruitfully be developed theoretically with inclusion of a transaction cost theory and economics encompassing the society in general.Practical implicationsSignificant correlations that are found could certainly function as an input for the various stakeholders in the provision of office spaces of growth firms during fluctuations of GDP and market growth.Originality/valueAn extensive survey is a base for a conceptualisation of the dynamics of office space related to studied factors.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference21 articles.
1. Abramovitz, M. (1989), Thinking about Growth and Other Essays on Economic Growth and Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Brown, G.T. (1984), “Real estate cycles alter the valuation perspective”, Appraisal Journal, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 539‐49.
3. Bröchner, J. and Dettwiler, P. (2004), “Space use among growth companies: linking the theories”, in Alexander, K., Atkin, B., Bröchner, J. and Haugen, T. (Eds), Facilities Management: Innovation and Performance, Spon Press, London, pp. 47‐58.
4. Dehejia, V.H. and Rowe, N. (1998), “The effect of business cycles on growth: Keynes vs. Schumpeter”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 26, pp. 501‐11.
5. Dettwiler, P. (2006a), “Offices of Swedish growth firms: facilities management variables”, Facilities, Vol. 24 Nos 5/6, pp. 221‐41.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献