Bank market power and firm creation: a multi-country analysis

Author:

Agostino Mariarosaria,Trivieri Francesco

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between bank market power and firm creation, which represents a debated issue in the economic literature, still lacking empirical evidence. Design/methodology/approach – The analysis is carried out by taking an international perspective, using different measures of banking competition, and controlling for a large set of determinants suggested by the variegate literature on firms’ birth drivers. Findings – The main finding suggests that credit market competition may benefit firms’ creation, as the relationship between the latter and bank market power – when statistically significant – appears to be negative. In addition, the detrimental impact of market power appears greater (in absolute terms) when departing from higher levels of banking competition. Research limitations/implications – The empirical evidence seems supporting the competitive position in the debate on the role of banking competition. Furthermore, the authors reckon that the findings reinforce the belief of a crucial role played by the availability of funds for nascent firms, with evident implications for the policy strategies more appropriate to foster entrepreneurship. The “fashion” followed by several countries of lowering administrative entry barriers (van Stel et al., 2007) needs to be reappraised, pondering also means to enrich resources availability. Originality/value – To the best of the knowledge, the paper is the first one addressing the issue of the role of bank market structure on firms’ creation in a multi-country setting.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference111 articles.

1. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (1988), “Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis”, American Economic Review , Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 678-690.

2. Acs, Z.J. , Sameeksha, D. and Hessels, J. (2008), “Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 219-234.

3. Acs, Z.J. , Arenius, P. , Hay, M. and Minniti, M. (2004), “Global entrepreneurship monitor, executive report”, Babson College, Babson Park, MA and London Business School, London.

4. Agostino, M. and Trivieri, F. (2010), “Is banking competition beneficial to SMEs? An empirical study based on Italian data”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 335-355.

5. Altonji, J. and Segal, L. (1994), “Small sample bias in GMM estimation of covariance structures”, NBER Working Paper No. 156, Cambridge, MA.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3