Collective information structure model for Information Security Risk Assessment (ISRA)

Author:

Shamala Palaniappan,Ahmad Rabiah,Zolait Ali Hussein,bin Sahib Shahrin

Abstract

Purpose – Information security has become an essential entity for organizations across the globe to eliminate the possible risks in their organizations by conducting information security risk assessment (ISRA). However, the existence of numerous different types of risk assessment methods, standards, guidelines and specifications readily available causes the organizations to face the daunting tasks in determining the most suitable method that would augur well in meeting their needs. Therefore, to overcome this tedious process, this paper suggests collective information structure model for ISRA. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed ISRA model was developed by deploying a questionnaire using close-ended questions administrated to a group of information security practitioners in Malaysia (N = 80). The purpose of the survey was to strengthen and add more relevant additional features to the existing framework, as it was developed based on secondary data. Findings – Previous comparative and analyzed studies reveals that all the six types of ISRA methodologies have features of the same kind of information with a slight difference in form. Therefore, questionnaires were designed to insert additional features to the research framework. All the additional features chosen were based on high frequency of more than half percentage agreed responses from respondents. The analyses results inspire in generating a collective information structure model which more practical in the real environment of the workplace. Practical implications – Generally, organizations need to make comparisons between methodologies and decide on the best due to the inexistence of agreed reference benchmark in ISRA methodologies. This tedious process leads to unwarranted time, money and energy consumption. Originality/value – The collective information structure model for ISRA aims to assist organizations in getting a general view of ISRA flow and gathering information on the requirements to be met before risk assessment can be conducted successfully. This model can be conveniently used by organizations to complete all the required planning as well as to select the suitable methods to complete the ISRA.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Computer Science,Information Systems

Reference64 articles.

1. Aagedal, J.Ø. , Braber, F. , Den, Dimitrakos, T. , Gran, B.A. , Raptis, D. and Stølen, K. (2002), “Model-based risk assessment to improve enterprise security”, Proceedings of the Fifth International IEEE Conference on Distributed Object Computing (EDOC 2002), Lausanne, pp. 51-62.

2. Albert, C. and Dorofee, A.J. (2001), OCTAVE Criteria Version 2.0 , Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

3. Alberts, C.J. and Dorofee, A.J. (2002), Managing Information Security Risks: The Octave Approach , Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston, MA, pp. 1-512.

4. Alberts, C.J. , Dorofee, A.J. and Allen, J.H. (2001), OCTAVE Catalog of Practices Version 2.0 , Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

5. Alberts, C. , Dorofee, A. , Stevens, J. and Woody, C. (2003), Introduction to the OCTAVE® Approach – Networked Systems Survivability Program , Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-27.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3