Working together: making the case for integrated forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities
Author:
MacMahon Kenneth,McClements Ricky
Abstract
Purpose
– There is a general consensus that healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities should be provided by multi-disciplinary teams. Within a forensic setting, recommendations are often made for separate or “parallel” forensic teams, operating independently of generic mental health or intellectual disability teams. An alternative to this model is an “integrated” service, where specialist forensic clinicians work within the general intellectual disability service, to provide support for clients with forensic needs. For clients with intellectual disabilities and forensic needs, there may be advantages to providing access to a wider multi-disciplinary team, through the application of an integrated model. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the working of an integrated forensic service within a learning disability team, to identify positive aspects of this model, and how potential shortcomings may be overcome.
Design/methodology/approach
– Literature review, description of service outline with case example.
Findings
– Although some studies have compared parallel and integrated forensic models within mental health services, there are no evaluations that compare models of forensic services for individuals with intellectual disabilities. However, specific advantages of an integrated model may include availability of multi-disciplinary clinicians, development of forensic skills across wider groups of clinicians, reduction in stigma and avoidance of delay in transfer of care between services. In addition, in areas with smaller populations, parallel services may not be feasible due to low case numbers.
Originality/value
– There has been no formal evaluation of parallel vs integrated forensic services within an intellectual disability setting. However, the authors describe a fully integrated service and suggest means by which the potential shortcomings of an integrated model may be overcome.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Pshychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference24 articles.
1. Ali, A.
,
Hassiotis, A.
,
Strydom, A.
and
King, M.
(2012), “Self stigma in people with intellectual disabilities and courtesy stigma in family carers: a systematic review”,
Research in Developmental Disabilities
, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 2122-40. 2. Bannister, D.
,
Nicholson, L.
,
Punshon, C.
,
Ward, E.
,
Lee, A.
,
Kaur, K.
,
Whitehead, R.
,
Cookson, A.
and
Greenhill, B.
(2008), “Human rights benchmarking tool”, available at: www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/documents/humanrights/HRO/mersey_care_benchmarking_tool.pdf (accessed 1 August 2015). 3. Brown, S.
(1999), “Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders”,
Legal and Criminological Psychology
, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 239-52. 4. Camilleri, J.A.
and
Quinsey, V.L.
(2011), “Appraising the risk of sexual and violent recidivism among intellectually disabled offenders”,
Psychology, Crime and Law
, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 59-74. 5. Coid, J.
,
Hickey, N.
,
Kahtan, N.
,
Zhang, T.
and
Yang, M.
(2007), “Patients discharged from medium secure forensic psychiatry services: reconvictions and risk factors”,
British Journal of Psychiatry
, Vol. 190 No. 3, pp. 223-9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|