The augmented subjective risk management process

Author:

Emblemsvåg Jan

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present an augmented subjective risk management process that can partially solve the problem of inconsistent results in qualitative risk management. Note that “subjective” in this context is to separate this risk management process from the purely statistical risk management processes often associated with finance.Design/methodology/approachThe approach has been developed by logically approaching the problem of inconsistency and, based on experience and literature review, conceptually designing a solution.FindingsThe presented approach seems workable and indeed an improvement over standard qualitative approaches given reasonable skillful implementation.Research limitations/implicationsThe approach has not yet been tested in real life, which must be undertaken in the future.Practical implicationsThe presented approach will expand the subjective risk management process to include information management and to some extent knowledge management and thus add some more activities to the practice of risk management.Originality/valueThe paper presents an approach that so far seems useful in improving the consistency of subjective risk management. Also, it may be a valuable point of departure for further research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference26 articles.

1. Argyris, C. (1977), “Double loop learning in organizations”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 55, September/October.

2. Argyris, C. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Company, Colorado Springs, CO, p. 304.

3. Asllani, A. and Luthans, F. (2003), “What knowledge managers really do: an empirical and comparative analysis”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 53‐66.

4. Backlund, F. and Hannu, J. (2002), “Can we make maintenance decisions on risk analysis results?”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 77‐91.

5. Bernstein, P.L. (1996), Against the Gods: the Remarkable Story of Risk, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, p. 383.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3