Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries

Author:

Lee Sang M.,Hwang Taewon,Choi Donghyun

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the current open innovation practices in the public sector of leading countries.Design/methodology/approachUsing a framework based on the role of the government in open innovation, this study analyses a profile of early open innovation adopters based on collected data from secondary sources.FindingsFirst, the USA, Australia and Singapore developed open innovation policies at the national level, facilitating a positive innovation climate. Many projects, especially those in online platforms, were established under these policies. Second, although outside‐in open innovation principles seem to be popular, there have been emerging attempts to exploit the value of government data through inside‐out approaches.Research limitations/implicationsMost governments are in the early stages of adoption of open innovation and are in the process of understanding relevant issues. Future research should investigate how governments adopt open innovation, in particular inside‐out initiatives.Practical implicationsGovernments should develop an overarching strategic plan, which would help its employees to recognise that new change is consistent with the needs of their workplace practices. Some organizations and projects led by citizens help the government engage external ideas in solving issues that are beyond its control.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to examine the current open innovation policies at the government level.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference45 articles.

1. Ahn, M. and York, A. (2010), “A resource‐based view of innovation, technology transfer and commercialization”, Proceedings of United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference in Nashville, Tennessee.

2. Albury, D. (2005), “Fostering innovation in public services”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 51‐6.

3. Arganoff, R. (2007), Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.

4. Bartlett, D. and Dibben, P. (2002), “Public sector entrepreneurs and innovation: case studies from local government”, Local Government Studies, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 107‐21.

5. Bommert, B. (2010), “Collaborative innovation in the public sector”, International Public Management Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 15‐33.

Cited by 213 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3