A sustainable collaborative research dialogue between practitioners and academics

Author:

Chen Chun‐Yu,Jim Wu Yen‐Chun,Wu Wen‐Hsiung

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the co‐production of knowledge and dialogic relationships via the collaboration between business practitioners and academic researchers.Design/methodology/approachThe motivations, expectations, communication processes, and final performance of those engaged in collaborative management research are explored by applying a two‐pronged methodology with a content analysis and an e‐mail survey. The authors conducted a content analysis on 136 articles identified out of a total of 2,029 articles from six leading journals during 2006‐2011 which fulfilled the criteria of being coauthored by both professors and practitioners. An e‐mail survey of six open questions was given to pre‐screened authors in the first stage to investigate the in‐depth dialogue processes and stories of these collaborations.FindingsThe results revealed that collaboration topics of interest focused mostly on organizational behavior, business policy, and strategy, and that theoretical inquiry and case study were the most used research methods. According to the 68 valid returned e‐mail surveys, the providing of consulting services by professors in firms plays a critical role in facilitating knowledge co‐creation between practice and knowing. The findings also highlight key factors of sustainable co‐production relationships.Originality/valueThis study provides an empirical, valuable step towards an investigation into the co‐creation dialogue experiences of practitioners and academics in three dimensions: purpose, procedure, and promise.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference37 articles.

1. Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2009), “Knowledge impact and scholarship: unlearning and practising to co‐create actionable knowledge”, Management Learning, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 421‐30.

2. Avison, D.E., Lau, F., Myers, M.D. and Nielsen, P.A. (1999), “Action research”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 94‐7.

3. Beech, N., MacIntosh, R. and MacLean, D. (2010), “Dialogues between academics and practitioners: the role of generative dialogic encounters”, Organization Studies, Vol. 31 Nos 9‐10, pp. 1341‐67.

4. Bennis, W.G. and O'Toole, J. (2005), “How business schools lost their way”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 5, pp. 96‐104.

5. Cohen, D.J. (2007), “The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 1013‐9.

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3